| Change credit hours | Undergraduate |
| From: | ||
|---|---|---|
| Course Prefix & Number | Descriptive Title | Credits/Hours |
| IS425 | Introduction to Project Management | 3 - 3 |
| To: | ||
| Course Prefix & Number | Descriptive Title | Credits/Hours |
| IS425 | Introduction to Project Management | 4 - 4 |
|
Abbreviation for Class Schedule(20 spaces) Intro to Proj Mang |
|
Current Course Description: The origins of project management and its importance to improving the success of IT projects. Basic topics including scope, cost and time management will be covered. Students will work in groups to plan large scale project management. Students will also learn about software tools that aid in project management. Prerequisite: CS 350, CS 420 |
|
New Course Description: The origins of project management and its importance to improving the success of IT projects. Basic topics including scope, cost and time management will be covered. Students will work in groups to plan large scale project management. Students will also learn about software tools that aid in project management. Prerequisite: CS 350, CS 420 |
|
Justification for changing the course (e.g. alignment with other institutions, program revision, etc.): The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) 2008 reccommended curriculum describes courses and the material covered in those courses. Since this curriculum is based on a semester model, a move to four hour courses would allow us to cover more of the suggested material. |
|
Students/Program affected: Only majors and minors in Computer Science and majors in Information Systems are affected. By removing some requirements in the major the affect on the total number of credits required is unaffected. |
| Step | Approver | Decision | Timestamp |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 - Department | Scot Morse | Approved | December 15 2010 |
| 2 - Division | Scot Morse | Approved | December 15 2010 |
| 3 - Division Curriculum | John Marsaglia | Approved | December 16 2010 |
| 5 - Curriculum Committee | Robert Monge | Rejected | February 09 2011 |
|
Comments: There is nothing in the description of the listed courses to explain/justify the shift from 3 to 4 credits.
There needs to be the articulation to satisfy interior and exterior challenges in making a credit change.
A new catalog description for each course should be included to reflect the additional credit to the course.
The professional organization whose assessment of course credit awarded for amount of work should be cited as source for part of the justification.
Since the current catalog descriptions list more than the courses can currently cover at 3 credits, perhaps discussion of how the shift to 4 credits actually makes the current syllabus more possible.
|
|||
| 6 - Faculty Senate | Gavin Keulks | Rejected | June 09 2011 |
|
Comments: Rejecting to clean up the portal. Deans and above should do same. |
|||